Visual Proof — Timestamped, Verified, Admissible

Context

Bri Bosma placed 11 calls to the reporting party between 4:31 PM and 4:34 PM CST on August 2, 2026. During one of those calls, she left this voicemail in which Bri Bosma was speaking and Evan Bosma chimed in from the background with the verbatim death threat. This is the central evidence in the harassment case and is preserved in its original .amr format with cryptographic verification.

Context

Sent by Bri Bosma 2 minutes after the death threat voicemail. The text message extends the harassment in writing, references the consumer-protection disclosure, and explicitly targets the reporting party's family. The text was sent within 3.5 hours of the public whistleblower disclosure about alleged fraud at Nutrition Excellence LLC.

Context

The phone carrier's call log is a separate, independent record from the voicemail and SMS. It documents 11 calls from Bri Bosma plus 1 missed call from Evan Bosma directly — all within a 4-minute window. This is the corroborating evidence that proves the death threats were coordinated conduct, not a single impulsive act. The call log cannot be edited or back-dated; it is generated and stored by the carrier.

Context

The reporting party filed a police report with Blaine Police Department within one hour of the death threats. The case number 2618-0471 is referenced in every subsequent regulatory filing to establish the federal nexus between the alleged consumer fraud and the retaliatory conduct.

Context

After Bergseth Bros placed the $90,000 order and the North Dakota Department of Agriculture required additional clearance before products could be sold in that state, Evan Bosma sent written communications to the reporting party admitting he was "about to threatened John" — referring to John Mortenson, the ND state official with regulatory authority. The reporting party responded in real time with a request that Evan Bosma not threaten the state official. Evan Bosma himself acknowledged the impropriety by stating "But I shouldn't."

This evidence establishes: (1) Evan Bosma was prepared to threaten a state regulator to obtain clearance for misbranded products; (2) Evan Bosma acknowledged to the reporting party that the conduct was improper; and (3) the reporting party acted as the internal compliance voice and objected in writing before any threats occurred. These communications are preserved with cryptographic verification and EXIF metadata.

Context

This text thread shows: (1) Evan Bosma instructed the reporting party to use Minnesota bags for North Dakota distribution, which is the underlying product substitution alleged in Section A of the AG complaint; (2) the reporting party raised immediate compliance concerns ("Couldn't that land us in hot water with all of North Dakota state?"); and (3) Evan Bosma acknowledged the regulatory concerns and indicated he would "think it through" rather than dismissing them outright. These messages establish that the interstate product substitution was conducted at the direction of Evan Bosma with the reporting party's contemporaneous written objections.

Context

On the same day as the death threats, Evan Bosma sent written communications to the reporting party admitting that he had installed Teramind employee-monitoring software on the reporting party's personal laptop. This admission establishes a pattern of unlawful conduct by Evan Bosma directed at the reporting party personally, supports the credibility of the death threats documented above, and is itself evidence of separate criminal offenses under Minnesota and federal electronic communications privacy laws.

Context

The complete evidence package is cryptographically signed (SHA-256 hash) and includes a manifest documenting chain of custody. Any journalist, agency, or court can independently verify that the contents of the ZIP have not been modified since the original timestamp by comparing their computed SHA-256 hash against the value above.