FULL DOSSIER
This dossier documents complaints and reports filed with state and federal regulatory authorities. The named individual retains the presumption of innocence and has not been adjudicated by any court or agency. Every allegation below is attributed to a documented source — either a regulatory filing (with case number), a contemporaneous record (with timestamp), a public record, or firsthand observation captured in real time.
The publisher makes no personal assertion of criminal wrongdoing and acknowledges that some matters described could be characterized differently by the subjects of the complaints. The purpose of this publication is to inform consumers, support regulatory review, and exercise the publisher's First Amendment right to report on matters of public concern. See the full legal disclaimer.
EVAN BOSMA
Operating As: Nutrition Elements, Moonshot Gummies
Operating Address: 10740 Lyndale Avenue, Suite 11W, Bloomington, MN 55420
Documented Period of Conduct: December 2025 through August 2026 (9 months)
Public Filing Status: Active Minnesota LLC (Minnesota Secretary of State)
Edible gummies reportedly formulated for the Minnesota market (containing no CBD per Minnesota regulatory framework) are alleged to have been packaged into bags labeled for North Dakota retail distribution claiming 75 mg CBD per serving. Consumers in North Dakota may have purchased a product represented as containing CBD when the allegedly substituted product contained no active CBD ingredient.
Documented SMS Evidence
Contemporaneous text messages from Evan Bosma, reproduced verbatim with original timestamps preserved:
"80,000 gummies in for nd. We bag them and then I seal with a machine."
"10mg thc gummies I put on page saying can't be sold in Minnesota but that's a lie I do."
Statutory Concerns
- 21 USC § 331(a) — Prohibits the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of any food that is adulterated or misbranded.
- North Dakota Century Code § 19-24.1 — Regulates industrial hemp and hemp products; requires accurate labeling of cannabinoid content.
- Minnesota Statute § 151 — Pharmacy and drug law; restricts the manufacture and sale of certain cannabinoid products.
Certificates of Analysis (COAs) — the regulatory compliance documents that certify a product's cannabinoid content, contaminant levels, and compliance with state law — are alleged to have been altered, duplicated, misapplied, or otherwise allegedly falsified across multiple production lots.
Categories of Alleged Irregularities
| Type | Alleged Irregularity | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| C-01 | Outdated COA applied to current lot | Misrepresentation of test date |
| C-02 | Duplicate COA lot numbers across different products | Impossible in legitimate testing |
| C-03 | COA results altered to show "passing" values | Potential contaminant concealment |
| C-04 | COA missing entirely for products actively on retail shelves | No documented compliance at all |
Statutory Concerns
- 18 USC § 1001 — False statements to a federal agency or in matters within federal jurisdiction.
- ND CC § 19-24.1-36 — Hemp product testing and labeling requirements.
- FDA 21 CFR Part 111 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice for dietary supplements (where applicable).
Edible THC/CBD gummies reportedly intended for retail distribution are alleged to have been hand-packaged in a commercial office suite with documented absence of the sanitation infrastructure required for food manufacturing. Photographic and video evidence has been provided to the Minnesota Department of Health.
📸 Photographic Evidence (EXHIBIT A)
Photograph taken 2026-08-02 at 14:35:53 CST at 10740 Lyndale Avenue, Suite 11W, Bloomington, MN 55420. Original device metadata preserved. Filed as evidence with Minnesota Department of Health . Photograph depicts the commercial office environment in which edible products are alleged to have been packaged for retail sale.
🎥 Video Evidence (EXHIBIT B)
Video recorded 2026-08-02 at 15:03:50 CST. SHA-256:
1f79de76f38e5ffc8c72aa50f53aad097bfe0839a51072d2541144fe920e4623.
Original file preserved with device metadata. Provided to Minnesota Department of Health.
Documented Absent Infrastructure
The following items are alleged to have been absent from the packing environment:
- Utility sink for hand washing
- Commercial hand-washing station
- Soap and sanitizer
- Disposable gloves
- Hair and beard coverings
- Food-grade work surfaces
- Temperature-controlled storage
- Allergen-segregation controls
- Pest-control measures
- Documented sanitation logs
Statutory Concerns
- 21 CFR Part 117 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food.
- Minnesota Statute § 31.101 — Food establishments: cleanliness and sanitation requirements.
- 21 USC § 331 — Adulterated food in interstate commerce.
An employee alleges that Teramind employee-monitoring software was installed on a personal laptop without knowledge or consent. The owner is alleged to have admitted the installation in writing via SMS.
Documented Admission
"I had Teramind on your labtop buddy! You're one dumb fucker."
Alleged Capabilities of Installed Software
- Keystroke logging (capture of all typed input)
- Periodic screenshots of the user's screen
- Active application and website tracking
- Clipboard monitoring
- File-access tracking
Statutory Concerns
- 18 USC § 2511 — Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications.
- Stored Communications Act, 18 USC § 2701 — Unauthorized access to stored electronic communications.
- Minnesota Statute § 626A — Minnesota wiretap law.
- CFAA, 18 USC § 1030 — Computer fraud and abuse (potential unauthorized access to a protected computer).
⚠ ALLEGATION SUMMARY
Within 3.5 hours of a public consumer-protection disclosure on August 2, 2026, Bri Bosma (owner's spouse) placed 11 calls to the reporting party's mobile phone. During one of those calls, she left a 31-second voicemail in which Bri Bosma was speaking and Evan Bosma chimed in from the background stating verbatim: "I'm gonna fucking kill you, bitch." Evan Bosma placed a missed call from (612) 816-3172 at 4:32 PM CST. At 4:34 PM CST, Bri Bosma sent a text message containing additional verbatim threats. A police report was filed with the Blaine Police Department within one hour; assigned Case 2618-0471.
Documented Voicemail Excerpt
"I'm gonna fucking kill you, bitch."
Statutory Concerns
- 18 USC § 875(c) — Interstate communication of threat to kidnap or injure.
- Minn. Stat. § 609.748 — Harassment Restraining Order statute (basis for pending HRO petition in Anoka County District Court).
- 18 USC § 1513 — Retaliation against a federal witness (whistleblower).
📋 Read Full Threats Documentation 📄 Police Report Addendum (PDF)
⚠ ALLEGATION SUMMARY
After Bergseth Bros placed a $90,000 order and the North Dakota Department of Agriculture required additional clearance for products to be sold in that state, Evan Bosma sent written communications stating verbatim: "Im about to threatened John" — referring to John Mortenson, a North Dakota state official with regulatory authority over consumer products. The reporting party responded in real time: "Don't. Stay legally in the right path and we will fight things." Evan Bosma himself acknowledged the impropriety by stating "But I shouldn't."
Documented Text Excerpts
"Im about to threatened John" — Evan Bosma, 11:57 AM
"Who do we talk to" — Reporting party
"But I shouldn't" — Evan Bosma
"Don't. Stay legally in the right path and we will fight things" — Reporting party, 11:58 AM
Statutory Concerns
- 18 USC § 1505 — Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.
- 18 USC § 1512 — Witness intimidation / tampering.
- 18 USC § 1513 — Retaliation against a federal witness.
The four allegation categories above are not isolated incidents. Documentary evidence suggests a consistent pattern of conduct over a 9-month documented period. The following observations support the pattern analysis:
- Multiple product lines affected. Both THC and CBD product lines are represented in the documentary evidence.
- Multiple jurisdictions affected. Conduct spans Minnesota (state law), North Dakota (state law), and federal jurisdiction (interstate commerce).
- Multiple document categories allegedly falsified. Production records, formulation documentation, COAs, and SMS admissions each independently corroborate the others.
- Admissions in writing. Multiple admissions by the principal in his own contemporaneous text messages remove any plausible "misunderstanding" defense.
- Conduct continued after warning. Documented SMS exchanges show that the conduct continued after the principal was informed of the regulatory concerns.
Pattern evidence is provided to regulatory authorities for their evaluation. The publisher makes no independent finding of "pattern" or "intent" — that determination belongs to the agencies and courts of competent jurisdiction.
The following categories of potential consumer harm are alleged. Consumers who believe they may be affected should consult a licensed medical professional and consider filing a complaint with the relevant state agency (see How to File a Complaint).
| Risk Category | Description | Affected Group |
|---|---|---|
| Mislabeled CBD content | Consumers in ND receiving 0mg CBD product labeled as 75mg | ND retail purchasers |
| Bacterial contamination | Pathogen exposure from unsanitary packing | All retail consumers |
| Cross-contamination | Non-food materials in packing environment | All retail consumers |
| Untested product | Products sold without COA or with allegedly falsified COA | All retail consumers |
| Dosage inconsistency | Manual handling without calibrated equipment | All retail consumers |
Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management
Complaint filed regarding alleged fraudulent cannabinoid product labeling and misrepresentation to a state agency.
FiledNorth Dakota Department of Agriculture
Complaint filed with John Mortenson regarding alleged adulterated/misbranded hemp products allegedly shipped across state lines.
Active complaint — case number pending formal filingMinnesota Department of Health
Active complaint regarding public health violations related to unsanitary food manufacturing conditions.
FiledFederal Authorities
Federal tip submitted regarding alleged interstate commerce violations and product misbranding.
- December 2025 — Business relationship begins. Reporter begins employment at Nutrition Excellence LLC.
- December 5, 2025 — Evan Bosma SMS: "80,000 gummies in for nd. We bag them and then I seal with a machine." (Documents scale of ND packaging.)
- December 23, 2025 — Evan Bosma SMS: "10mg thc gummies I put on page saying can't be sold in Minnesota but that's a lie I do." (Alleged admission of misrepresentation.)
- January – April 2026 — Documented observations of product substitution. Reporter is instructed to participate and refuses.
- May – July 2026 — Multiple COA irregularities identified. Alleged outdated COAs applied to current production lots.
- July 30, 2026 — Wage check allegedly bounces. Evan reportedly responds indicating only $5,000 in the business account.
- August 1, 2026 — Evan Bosma SMS: "I had Teramind on your labtop buddy! You're one dumb fucker." (Alleged admission of spyware installation.)
- August 2, 2026 — Complaints filed with OCM, NDDA, MDH, and Federal Authorities. This consumer-warning site published.
If You Purchased a Product
Stop consuming. Photograph and preserve the package, receipt, and lot number. File a complaint with the relevant state agency.
🔍 Verify Your Product📋 How to File a Complaint
If You Are a Retailer
Consider removing Nutrition Elements / Moonshot Gummies products from shelves pending regulatory resolution. Preserve purchase records and contact the Minnesota Department of Health if you have concerns.
🏛️ Regulatory Filing DetailsIf You Are a Journalist
This publication provides primary-source documentation for editorial coverage. Source materials are available on production to any credentialed journalist with proper request.
📧 Contact for Source MaterialIf You Are the Subject of These Allegations
You retain the presumption of innocence and may respond to any allegation through the regulatory channels referenced above or through any court of competent jurisdiction. Verified counter-notices will receive prompt review.
📋 Notice-and-Takedown Procedure