FULL DOSSIER

EVAN BOSMA
Nutrition Excellence LLC — dba "Nutrition Elements" / "Moonshot Gummies"
⚠ 4 ACTIVE REGULATORY COMPLAINTS · 14 SOURCED EVIDENCE ITEMS · 9 MONTHS OF DOCUMENTED CONDUCT ⚠
⚖ Important — How to Read This Document

This dossier documents complaints and reports filed with state and federal regulatory authorities. The named individual retains the presumption of innocence and has not been adjudicated by any court or agency. Every allegation below is attributed to a documented source — either a regulatory filing (with case number), a contemporaneous record (with timestamp), a public record, or firsthand observation captured in real time.

The publisher makes no personal assertion of criminal wrongdoing and acknowledges that some matters described could be characterized differently by the subjects of the complaints. The purpose of this publication is to inform consumers, support regulatory review, and exercise the publisher's First Amendment right to report on matters of public concern. See the full legal disclaimer.

Executive Summary — Allegations at a Glance Overview
# Alleged Conduct Statutory Concern Filed With Status
A-01 Product Substitution & Misbranding 21 USC § 331; ND CC § 19-24.1; MN Stat. 151 FDA OCI · NDDA · OCM · AG Filed
A-02 COA / Document Fraud 18 USC § 1001 (false statements) FDA OCI · NDDA · OCM Filed
A-03 Unsanitary Manufacturing 21 CFR Part 117; MN Stat. 31.101 MDH · Pending email send Pending
A-04 Unauthorized Employee Surveillance 18 USC § 2511 (wiretap); MN Stat. 626A FBI Minneapolis · Civil remedies Pending FBI
A-05 Retaliatory Death Threats vs Whistleblower 18 USC § 875(c); Minn. Stat. § 609.748 Blaine PD Case 2618-0471 · HRO Pending Filed
Subject Identification Identity
Subject of consumer-warning publication — photograph reproduced with metadata preserved for evidentiary purposes
⚠ Subject of Complaints

EVAN BOSMA

Role: Sole member / registered agent of Nutrition Excellence LLC
Operating As: Nutrition Elements, Moonshot Gummies
Operating Address: 10740 Lyndale Avenue, Suite 11W, Bloomington, MN 55420
Documented Period of Conduct: December 2025 through August 2026 (9 months)
Public Filing Status: Active Minnesota LLC (Minnesota Secretary of State)
Allegation A-01 — Product Substitution & Misbranding Filed
⚠ Allegation Summary

Edible gummies reportedly formulated for the Minnesota market (containing no CBD per Minnesota regulatory framework) are alleged to have been packaged into bags labeled for North Dakota retail distribution claiming 75 mg CBD per serving. Consumers in North Dakota may have purchased a product represented as containing CBD when the allegedly substituted product contained no active CBD ingredient.

Documented SMS Evidence

Contemporaneous text messages from Evan Bosma, reproduced verbatim with original timestamps preserved:

"80,000 gummies in for nd. We bag them and then I seal with a machine."

"10mg thc gummies I put on page saying can't be sold in Minnesota but that's a lie I do."

Statutory Concerns

📋 View Full Substitution Evidence

Allegation A-02 — Certificate of Analysis Irregularities Filed
⚠ Allegation Summary

Certificates of Analysis (COAs) — the regulatory compliance documents that certify a product's cannabinoid content, contaminant levels, and compliance with state law — are alleged to have been altered, duplicated, misapplied, or otherwise allegedly falsified across multiple production lots.

Categories of Alleged Irregularities

Type Alleged Irregularity Risk
C-01Outdated COA applied to current lotMisrepresentation of test date
C-02Duplicate COA lot numbers across different productsImpossible in legitimate testing
C-03COA results altered to show "passing" valuesPotential contaminant concealment
C-04COA missing entirely for products actively on retail shelvesNo documented compliance at all

Statutory Concerns

📄 View Full COA Evidence

Allegation A-03 — Unsanitary Manufacturing Conditions Active MDH
☣ Public Health Concern — MDH Minnesota Department of Health complaint

Edible THC/CBD gummies reportedly intended for retail distribution are alleged to have been hand-packaged in a commercial office suite with documented absence of the sanitation infrastructure required for food manufacturing. Photographic and video evidence has been provided to the Minnesota Department of Health.

📸 Photographic Evidence (EXHIBIT A)

Alleged unsanitary packing environment at 10740 Lyndale Avenue, Suite 11W, Bloomington, MN — photograph taken 2026-08-02 14:35:53 with original device metadata preserved
📸 EXHIBIT A — Alleged Packing Environment

Photograph taken 2026-08-02 at 14:35:53 CST at 10740 Lyndale Avenue, Suite 11W, Bloomington, MN 55420. Original device metadata preserved. Filed as evidence with Minnesota Department of Health . Photograph depicts the commercial office environment in which edible products are alleged to have been packaged for retail sale.

🎥 Video Evidence (EXHIBIT B)

🎥 EXHIBIT B — Video Walkthrough of Alleged Facility

Video recorded 2026-08-02 at 15:03:50 CST. SHA-256: 1f79de76f38e5ffc8c72aa50f53aad097bfe0839a51072d2541144fe920e4623. Original file preserved with device metadata. Provided to Minnesota Department of Health.

Documented Absent Infrastructure

The following items are alleged to have been absent from the packing environment:

Statutory Concerns

📋 Full Unsanitary Practices Page

Allegation A-04 — Unauthorized Employee Surveillance Federal Review
⚠ Allegation Summary

An employee alleges that Teramind employee-monitoring software was installed on a personal laptop without knowledge or consent. The owner is alleged to have admitted the installation in writing via SMS.

Documented Admission

"I had Teramind on your labtop buddy! You're one dumb fucker."

Alleged Capabilities of Installed Software

Statutory Concerns

🕵️ View Full Spyware Evidence

Allegation A-05 — Retaliatory Death Threats vs Whistleblower FILED · Blaine PD Case 2618-0471

⚠ ALLEGATION SUMMARY

Within 3.5 hours of a public consumer-protection disclosure on August 2, 2026, Bri Bosma (owner's spouse) placed 11 calls to the reporting party's mobile phone. During one of those calls, she left a 31-second voicemail in which Bri Bosma was speaking and Evan Bosma chimed in from the background stating verbatim: "I'm gonna fucking kill you, bitch." Evan Bosma placed a missed call from (612) 816-3172 at 4:32 PM CST. At 4:34 PM CST, Bri Bosma sent a text message containing additional verbatim threats. A police report was filed with the Blaine Police Department within one hour; assigned Case 2618-0471.

Documented Voicemail Excerpt

"I'm gonna fucking kill you, bitch."

— Evan Bosma, chiming in during voicemail · SHA-256 3a28a4fc9c4f1398d1b40250d329fde033651255c7c4bba8b2643922afa1bbdb

Statutory Concerns

📋 Read Full Threats Documentation 📄 Police Report Addendum (PDF)

Allegation A-06 — Threats Against North Dakota State Official CRITICAL

⚠ ALLEGATION SUMMARY

After Bergseth Bros placed a $90,000 order and the North Dakota Department of Agriculture required additional clearance for products to be sold in that state, Evan Bosma sent written communications stating verbatim: "Im about to threatened John" — referring to John Mortenson, a North Dakota state official with regulatory authority over consumer products. The reporting party responded in real time: "Don't. Stay legally in the right path and we will fight things." Evan Bosma himself acknowledged the impropriety by stating "But I shouldn't."

Documented Text Excerpts

"Im about to threatened John" — Evan Bosma, 11:57 AM

"Who do we talk to" — Reporting party

"But I shouldn't" — Evan Bosma

"Don't. Stay legally in the right path and we will fight things" — Reporting party, 11:58 AM

— SMS thread preserved with EXIF metadata · SHA-256 23b233421e17a747e189d0e7ca71c18be756329d8ae2a816be6545cda4dcc694

Statutory Concerns

📸 View Full Evidence

Pattern of Conduct — Not Isolated Incidents Analysis

The four allegation categories above are not isolated incidents. Documentary evidence suggests a consistent pattern of conduct over a 9-month documented period. The following observations support the pattern analysis:

  1. Multiple product lines affected. Both THC and CBD product lines are represented in the documentary evidence.
  2. Multiple jurisdictions affected. Conduct spans Minnesota (state law), North Dakota (state law), and federal jurisdiction (interstate commerce).
  3. Multiple document categories allegedly falsified. Production records, formulation documentation, COAs, and SMS admissions each independently corroborate the others.
  4. Admissions in writing. Multiple admissions by the principal in his own contemporaneous text messages remove any plausible "misunderstanding" defense.
  5. Conduct continued after warning. Documented SMS exchanges show that the conduct continued after the principal was informed of the regulatory concerns.

Pattern evidence is provided to regulatory authorities for their evaluation. The publisher makes no independent finding of "pattern" or "intent" — that determination belongs to the agencies and courts of competent jurisdiction.

⚠ Documented Categories of Potential Harm to Consumers Public Interest

The following categories of potential consumer harm are alleged. Consumers who believe they may be affected should consult a licensed medical professional and consider filing a complaint with the relevant state agency (see How to File a Complaint).

Risk Category Description Affected Group
Mislabeled CBD contentConsumers in ND receiving 0mg CBD product labeled as 75mgND retail purchasers
Bacterial contaminationPathogen exposure from unsanitary packingAll retail consumers
Cross-contaminationNon-food materials in packing environmentAll retail consumers
Untested productProducts sold without COA or with allegedly falsified COAAll retail consumers
Dosage inconsistencyManual handling without calibrated equipmentAll retail consumers
🏛️ Regulatory Filings — All Four Agencies Filed
🏛️ Filed

Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management

Complaint filed regarding alleged fraudulent cannabinoid product labeling and misrepresentation to a state agency.

🏛️ Filed

North Dakota Department of Agriculture

Complaint filed with John Mortenson regarding alleged adulterated/misbranded hemp products allegedly shipped across state lines.

🏛️ Active complaint — case number pending formal filing

Minnesota Department of Health

Active complaint regarding public health violations related to unsanitary food manufacturing conditions.

🔍 Filed

Federal Authorities

Federal tip submitted regarding alleged interstate commerce violations and product misbranding.

📅 Documented Timeline — December 2025 to August 2026 9 Months

📅 Full Timeline with Source Links

What You Can Do — By Audience Action Paths
🛒

If You Purchased a Product

Stop consuming. Photograph and preserve the package, receipt, and lot number. File a complaint with the relevant state agency.

🔍 Verify Your Product
📋 How to File a Complaint
🏪

If You Are a Retailer

Consider removing Nutrition Elements / Moonshot Gummies products from shelves pending regulatory resolution. Preserve purchase records and contact the Minnesota Department of Health if you have concerns.

🏛️ Regulatory Filing Details
📰

If You Are a Journalist

This publication provides primary-source documentation for editorial coverage. Source materials are available on production to any credentialed journalist with proper request.

📧 Contact for Source Material

If You Are the Subject of These Allegations

You retain the presumption of innocence and may respond to any allegation through the regulatory channels referenced above or through any court of competent jurisdiction. Verified counter-notices will receive prompt review.

📋 Notice-and-Takedown Procedure
← Home 📚 Master Sources Index 🔍 Verify Your Product ⚡ File a Complaint